Create the BRL-CAD Logo in BRL-CAD (#3)BRL-CAD
Status: ClosedTime to complete: 72 hrs Mentors: SeanTags: logo, graphics, 3D, modeling

The BRL-CAD Logo depicts two interlocked nodes. Modeling the new Logo in BRL-CAD in CSG (without NURBS, without polygons) requires some careful arrangement, but can provide an attractive three dimensional rendering that we can use for a number of purposes.

NOTE: The two segments you model MUST be two or more regions hinged together.  You can have center pins or not, you decide, but they MUST join together in some fashion.  Look at a hinge on a door near you.  Also, note that most images of our new logo show the black and red portions not connected but your version of the model MUST connect them together.

The output of this task will be a .g file of BRL-CAD logo and a rendered image.  This command run within MGED should help give you an interesting render:

rt -A0.75 -s1024 -c {set ambSamples=256}

References:

Note that there are other logo modeling tasks and yours must start from scratch and be completely original.  If we get a hint that yours was based off of or used measurements from some other model, you will be barred.
 
 
Uploaded Work
File name/URLFile sizeDate submitted
Render Image with .g file.zip135.4 KBDecember 10 2012 18:09 UTC
NEW.zip240.7 KBDecember 11 2012 09:20 UTC
brl.g16.1 KBDecember 12 2012 18:32 UTC
TOP.PNG89.2 KBDecember 12 2012 18:33 UTC
SIDE.PNG91.9 KBDecember 12 2012 18:33 UTC
Comments
Sharanon December 10 2012 02:04 UTCTask Claimed

I would like to work on this task.

Sean on December 10 2012 04:04 UTCTask Assigned

This task has been assigned to Sharan. You have 72 hours to complete this task, good luck!

Sharanon December 10 2012 18:09 UTCReady for review

The work on this task is ready to be reviewed.

Sharanon December 10 2012 18:16 UTCCompleted in 15 hrs :-)

I was new to this software.


The Documentation files helped me alot.


My previous experience in MAYA  made it a lot easier.

Sean on December 11 2012 01:19 UTCalmost there...

Sharan, that's looking good, but the two regions do not hinge together.  Note in the description that they need to "connect" together.  Think of a bike chain or a door hinge even.  The black one needs to go "into the red one.

Sean on December 11 2012 01:20 UTCTask Needs More Work

One of the mentors has sent this task back for more work. Talk to the mentor(s) assigned to this task to satisfy the requirements needed to complete this task, submit your work again and mark the task as complete once you re-submit your work.

Sharanon December 11 2012 09:19 UTCReady for review

The work on this task is ready to be reviewed.

Sharanon December 11 2012 09:21 UTCHey

Check the NEW.zip file.

Sean on December 12 2012 15:34 UTCnot symmetric?

Sharan, I apparently didn't even notice in your first example that they're not symmetric.  It becomes *very* apparent when you joined them together.  The two left/right holes should be the same distance from the "center" hole.  Also, your model has a modeling error in part3.r where you have a region unioned into a region.  Either part3.r shouldn't be a region (and should be renamed) or part1.r shouldn't be a region (and should be renamed) or a different combination should be created that contains the same geometry as part1.r and then again for part2.r.  Make sense?


Also note that the "connection" between" the nodes isn't supposed to be just a straight ARB8 box like that -- it should be curved -- but that's not critical like the other problems.

Sean on December 12 2012 15:34 UTCTask Needs More Work

One of the mentors has sent this task back for more work. Talk to the mentor(s) assigned to this task to satisfy the requirements needed to complete this task, submit your work again and mark the task as complete once you re-submit your work.

Sean on December 12 2012 15:34 UTCDeadline extended

The deadline of the task has been extended with 1 days and 0 hours.

Sharanon December 12 2012 18:33 UTCReady for review

The work on this task is ready to be reviewed.

Sean on December 13 2012 07:07 UTCsubtractions

Your subtractions are slightly off, but that's undoubtedly because you tried to line up the wireframe instead of the actual edges and it's good effort regardless.  It'd tricky to get them perfectly tangent (there are more advanced methods to help with that).


Still, nicely done and good work cleaning up the errors!  

Sean on December 13 2012 07:07 UTCTask Closed

Congratulations, this task has been completed successfully.