Difference between revisions of "User:Clouddrift/GSoC2014"

From BRL-CAD
(Manifold)
(Why BRL-CAD)
Line 68: Line 68:
  
 
== Why BRL-CAD ==
 
== Why BRL-CAD ==
:It's no doubt that many commercial CAD software is outstanding and amazing, but their high price of each copy decides that not everyone could get such a CAD tool to try and improve their unconstrained idea. We need open source software to make people free, free, and more free. I like this open source CAD system and community. I believe it is worthy contributing efforts for BRL-CAD. At the meantime, I can learn rich and irreplaceable experience in connection with CAD from this project and other developers.
+
:It's no doubt that many commercial CAD software is outstanding and amazing, but their high price of each copy decides that not everyone could get such a CAD tool to try and improve their unconstrained idea. We need open source software to make people free, free, and more free. I like this open source CAD system and community. I believe it is worthy to contribute efforts for BRL-CAD. At the meantime, I can learn rich and irreplaceable experience in connection with CAD from this project and other developers.
  
 
== Why me ==
 
== Why me ==

Revision as of 09:47, 15 March 2014

Project Title

Mesh Library Cleanup

Synopsis

BRL-CAD has an extensive n-manifold (NMG) polygonal mesh library presently embedded within LIBRT. N-manifold can provide an arbitrary boundary representation structure. This part in BRL-CAD runs good but not excellent, for it is far away from expected stable, rubost and easy-read. Sometimes it causes some awkward performance problem and some algorithm based on current NMG is inefficient. The purpose of this project is to clean, validate and verify relevant source code about NMG.

Concepts

Some important concepts should be clear before starting this project.

Manifold

Manifold representations is commonly used in many commercial boundary based solid modeling systems. Kinds of data structures are useful to describe manifold solid. In early years, wing-edge structure is widely accepted by researchers and companies. With developed of the theory, half-edge structure exists and it's

Non-manifold

Unlike manifold, Non-manifold is a geometric modeling term referring to topological situations which are not restricted to be two-manifold. It can define not only volume but also surface, curve and point in a single uniform representation.

Detailed description

The current status of NMG

Now, this part of NMG is mainly located in raytrace.h and nmg.h where it is mixed with other irrelevant structs, macros and functions. It's not an ideal organization for other developers to read, use and maintain.

Remove redundant code

For some reason, the NMG primitive is originally designed and implemented for a stand-alone NMG CAD. But the situation changed. Some levels of current NMG become redundant, since it is possible to replace them with some parts in database structure now. Including:
1) model: represents the whole geometry, which is similar to the content of BRL-CAD *.g file.
2) nmgregion: sub-level structure beneath model, which is similar to the BRL-CAD region struct.
3) Maybe others.
I will remove them as well as relevant macros and functions to simply the problem. In the process, I should make sure there is no side-effect or new trouble introduced.

Extract NMG to be a stand-alone library

The concept of manifold is critical to many parts of geometry and mathematical physics because it allows more complicated structures to be described and understood in a more understandable way. So it can and should be combined into a function-independent library. I will check each line of the code in LIBRT, then move the NMG parts into a new stand-alone library named LIBNMG.
Besides, just like what has been done in LIBBU, it will be more resonable to divide the whole content into several header and code files,because accurate division can make code organization more clear.

Add comments

Complement some proper comments for header files in the new-built LIBNMG library.

Unit test

According to the experience from other developers in community, it is absolutely that lots of bugs are hidden in LIBNMG. So it is necessary to write a systematic set of test case. With more bugs discovered and fixed, the new-built library will be more readable and stable.
In my opinion, since test-driven development is indispensable in this project, gtest will be a good choice for the coming unit test.

Documentation

I referred to lots of date during my writing of this proposal. In the last part, for others who might be interested, I will explain how I approached this project and give some useful linked as well as a change list.

Schedule

  • Week 1 (19 May - 25 May): Estimate completely the influence of removing abundant structs. Make sure nothing misses attention.
  • Week 2 (26 May - 1 June): Remove the abundant structs and test briefly.
  • Week 3 - 4 (2 June - 15 June): Move the NMG parts from LIBRT into a new-built library, LIBNMG.
  • Week 5 - 6 (16 June - 29 June): Prepar for the mid-evaluation.
  • Week 7 - 9 (30 June - 20 July): Write test case by using gtest, and make sure everything goes well just like before and to fix bugs found.
  • Week 10 (21 July - 27 July): Complement the comments for the new library.
  • Week 11 (28 July - 3 August): Writing relevant documents.
  • Week 12 - 13 (4 August - 17 August): Prepare for final-evaluation.

Brief background

I am a graduate student in State Key Lab of CAD & CG, School of CS, Zhejiang University, China. I have 3-year work experience in programming a CAD module for an Optical Critical Dimension system in a conductor measurement company using Open Cascade. Now, my main research direction is something about hexahedral mesh.

Why BRL-CAD

It's no doubt that many commercial CAD software is outstanding and amazing, but their high price of each copy decides that not everyone could get such a CAD tool to try and improve their unconstrained idea. We need open source software to make people free, free, and more free. I like this open source CAD system and community. I believe it is worthy to contribute efforts for BRL-CAD. At the meantime, I can learn rich and irreplaceable experience in connection with CAD from this project and other developers.

Why me

I'm a graduate student of Zhejiang University, which is famous for its reputation in the field of CAD&CG research. I have a good background in CAD theory and programming skills. What's more important, this project is mainly about NMG mesh that is more or less related to my research and work experience. I have written a CAD module for an optical measurement system and it's easy-use and user-friendly interface help the company's sales. I am sure it is no problem for me to finish it with high quality in time.
And, I make sure I can dedicate at least 40 hours per week in this summer holiday, if needed can be more. I understand clearly the importance of adequate communication, getting suggestions from other experienced developers and theory experts can enormously saves twists and turns.

References

[1] http://www.scorec.rpi.edu/REPORTS/1986-1.pdf
[2] http://sourceforge.net/p/brlcad/mailman/message/28536100