Difference between revisions of "Talk:MGED Commands"
From BRL-CAD
(Command-scheme: purpose first?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Nov 20, 2009 | Nov 20, 2009 | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Good idea, except that if there's a connection between MGED commands and the stuff in the pull-down menus, I've not found it yet. They seem to be separate things. If I figure out how that works, I'll add it to the commands. --[[User:Ssd|Ssd]] 08:08, 20 November 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:08, 20 November 2009
I have just begun studying MGED-commands. For what my opinion is worth, permit me to say that I think the DESCRIPTION (= PURPOSE) of a command should be better placed as the first item, directly after its name.
Maybe it is asking too much also that it be somehow shown if, and eventually how, the command is (already) implemented in the main menu of the display and command-windows.
André Anckaert from Belgium.
Nov 20, 2009
- Good idea, except that if there's a connection between MGED commands and the stuff in the pull-down menus, I've not found it yet. They seem to be separate things. If I figure out how that works, I'll add it to the commands. --Ssd 08:08, 20 November 2009 (EST)
