Difference between revisions of "User:Bralani/GSoC2024/Log"

From BRL-CAD
Line 15: Line 15:
 
==Thursday, July 4st, 2024==
 
==Thursday, July 4st, 2024==
 
Got an average accuracy of 50% with NIF in predicting the true rendering. Tried with a simple KNN with a billion rays stored, got always 50% of accuracy. -> This means that there are some errors in the pipeline (maybe in generating the rays or conversions in spherical coordinates) because the KNN should be better than the random classifier with a billion rays of training set.
 
Got an average accuracy of 50% with NIF in predicting the true rendering. Tried with a simple KNN with a billion rays stored, got always 50% of accuracy. -> This means that there are some errors in the pipeline (maybe in generating the rays or conversions in spherical coordinates) because the KNN should be better than the random classifier with a billion rays of training set.
 
==Friday, July 5st, 2024==
 
Solved issues with rendering, got an accuracy of 98.6% with the true rendering (bounding sphere sampling).
 

Revision as of 11:20, 5 July 2024

Development Logs

Community Bonding Period


Monday, July 1st, 2024

Downloaded the code from the repo of fall rainy in order to have a common base source code. Then, installed different libraries (like pytorch) to make it work.

Tuesday, July 2st, 2024

Implemented a different version of the neural network (NIF) to make it work with hit/miss task. Got a 0.98 accuracy with bounding sphere approach.

Wednesday, July 3st, 2024

Compared a normal rendering with the neural network (NIF) one: results are still far from being acceptable.

Thursday, July 4st, 2024

Got an average accuracy of 50% with NIF in predicting the true rendering. Tried with a simple KNN with a billion rays stored, got always 50% of accuracy. -> This means that there are some errors in the pipeline (maybe in generating the rays or conversions in spherical coordinates) because the KNN should be better than the random classifier with a billion rays of training set.