| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Jimmie Butler<br> | + | Jimmie Butler |
| − | jimmiebtlr@gmail.com<br>
| |
| − | jimmiebtlr<br>
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h1>About Me</h1>
| + | jimmiebtlr@gmail.com |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Physics Experience</h2>
| + | jimmiebtlr |
| − | When I first started at Colorado School of Mines I planned on majoring in physics, I was a teachers assistant for physics 1 at this time. Throughout my time until I decided I in fact wanted to major Computer Science, I took the following pertinant classes, Classical Mechanics, and Advanced lab.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h3>Classical Mechanics</h3>
| + | I had several Engineering classes in High school, and have a heavy physics background ( was intending on majoring in it until junior year). Currently majoring in Computer Science at Colorado School of Mines. |
| − | This class covered nearly everything this project would entail (from a physics perspective). This included relativistic motion, lagrangian dynamics, some error calculation, and basic programming.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h3>Advanced Lab</h3>
| + | Non-vacuum gravity simulator |
| − | This class had a very heavy emphasis on error calculation.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h3>Thermal Physics</h3>
| |
| − | This class covered everything to do with thermodynamics from the microscopic to the macroscopic.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h2>Programming Experience</h2>
| |
| − | Now that I have switched to Computer Science I have taken or am currently taking the following courses Software Engineering, Computer Organization, Operating Systems, Scientific Computing, Algorithms, Data Structures.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h3>Software Engineering</h3>
| |
| − | This class is primarily focused on team development, using subversion, with an agile background.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h3>Computer Organization</h3>
| |
| − | This class focused on computers at the hardware level, giving a basic view of how machine numbers and optimization work.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h3>Operating Systems</h3>
| |
| − | This course focuses on memory handleing, as well as rounding off the subjects covered in Computer Organization.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h3>Scientific Computing</h3>
| |
| − | Scientific computing is completly based around the concept of reducing or elemenating error due to machine numbers in scientific calculations.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h3>Algorithms</h3>
| |
| − | Algorithms is a course which teaches how to implement and analize your own home rolled algorithms and how to analyze fellow programmers algorithms.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h3>Data Structures</h3>
| |
| − | Which data structure is most effecient for which use case, and how would I implement my own? Problem solved.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <h1>Brief project summary (<500 words)<br></h1>
| |
| − | Non-vacuum gravity simulator<br> | |
| | Simulate falling to a planet from a known starting point, knowing atmospheric composition and planets mass, as well as geometric shape and density function of the falling object. | | Simulate falling to a planet from a known starting point, knowing atmospheric composition and planets mass, as well as geometric shape and density function of the falling object. |
| | | | |
| − | <h1>Detailed project description (>500 words) <br></h1>
| + | This project would take into account what the starting parameters are in order to determine what algorithm to use i.e. falling 10 feet on earth with a moderate allowance of error could be done assuming constant atmospheric density and gravity. Whereas an object falling from several miles up would need to take into account the atmospheric density and changing gravitational strength. Air resistance would have to be calculated not only linearly but also rotationally, i.e. an arrow would tend to fall tip down to the planet, yet a baseball could rotate violently. A target accuracy, or otherwise sane defaults should be taken into account. |
| − | The starting point will be to implement an iterative loop which takes into account all forces until the object reaches at or below ground level, at which it will interpolate to find end conditions.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Air resistance would have to be calculated not only linearly but also rotationally, A target accuracy, or otherwise sane defaults should be taken into account. | |
| − | | |
| − | <h2>Basic Features<br></h2>
| |
| − | Calculate the gravitational strength at a set point in time, move the object in the direction of its velocity.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Air Resistance<br></h2>
| + | Links to any code or algorithms you intend to use |
| − | Air resistance would need to take into account torque on the object as well as the usual linear drag, i.e. an arrow would tend to fall tip down to the planet, yet a baseball could rotate violently. This section could also be used to determine interactions on material changes i.e. hitting water while falling. This would likely be implemented as a separate program.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>High speed objects<br></h2>
| |
| − | Take into account an object falling on the order of magnitude of c.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Thermal Conversion<br></h2>
| + | Deliverables |
| − | How much energy is expended to thermal energy, make estimates of end temperature? This would likely be similar to the air resistance section and implemented as a separate program.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Constraints<br></h2>
| + | -Constant gravity constant atmospheric density simulation simplistic air resistance |
| − | Use Lagrangian mechanics to determine motion of a falling object in relation to itself. This could become a large portion of the project and would likely be its own program, taking in forces constraints, and the object.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Bending Light<br></h2>
| + | -Varying gravity constant atmospheric density simulation simplistic air resistance |
| − | Should be able to be implemented through the implementation of the High speed objects section.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Optimization<br></h2>
| + | -Varying gravity varying atmospheric density simulation simplistic air resistance |
| − | This project would take into account what the starting parameters are in order to determine what algorithm to use i.e. falling 10 feet on earth with a moderate allowance of error could be done assuming constant atmospheric density and gravity. Whereas an object falling from several miles up would need to take into account the atmospheric density and changing gravitational strength.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Error<br></h2>
| + | -Varying gravity varying atmospheric density simulation complex air resistance (take rotation into account) |
| − | Any potential outputs would need their own error calculations, but perhaps more importantly is to keep track of error from machine number use. Using a double is clearly preferable in nearly all cases, but even that can have large amounts of error if ignored.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Using Bullet Physics engine<br></h2>
| |
| − | Bullet is intended primarily for realtime physics simulation, and as such may be applicable in cases where high amounts of error are acceptable (from a scientific perspective), or in the case of quick previews/realtime rendering.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Using Open Dynamics Library<br></h2>
| + | Development schedule |
| − | Another Game engine with the same constraints against the accuracy of the simulation.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Interesting Features<br></h2>
| + | -Basic |
| − | After implementing calculations for the high speed objects section, the correct configuration should yield an answer to gravitational lensing.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h2>Implementation</h2>
| + | --Varying gravity varying atmospheric density simulation simplistic air resistance |
| − | A new anim file, which would call the physics engine for a path that the objects should take, and which at that point would render it for the user to see.
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h1>Links to any code or algorithms you intend to use<br></h1>
| + | -Intermediate |
| − | For Air Resistance<br>
| |
| − | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)<br>
| |
| − | For fast objects<br>
| |
| − | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity<br>
| |
| − | For motion of complex objects.
| |
| − | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_mechanics<br>
| |
| | | | |
| − | <h1>Deliverables<br></h1>
| + | --Varying gravity varying atmospheric density simulation complex air resistance |
| − | Constant gravity constant atmospheric density simulation simplistic air resistance<br>
| |
| − | Varying gravity constant atmospheric density simulation simplistic air resistance<br>
| |
| − | Varying gravity varying atmospheric density simulation simplistic air resistance<br>
| |
| − | Varying gravity varying atmospheric density simulation complex air resistance (take rotation into account)<br> | |
| | | | |
| − | <h1>Development schedule<br></h1>
| + | -Advanced (Whatever time permits) |
| | | | |
| − | May 15 - May 30<br>
| + | --Non-Newtonian entrance speeds, fluid dynamics integration (falling through water or striking it) |
| − | -Get a better feel for BRL-CAD and interfacing with it, as well as implementing a dragless falling object in three dimensions. | |
| | | | |
| − | June 1 - June 15<br>
| |
| − | -Take into account air resistance and rotation.
| |
| | | | |
| − | June 15 - June 30<br>
| + | Time availability |
| − | -Work on an error management system, and optimizations.
| |
| | | | |
| − | July 1 - July 15<br>
| + | -4 week Field session ( Should be able to work ~40 hour weeks ) |
| − | -Take into account Non-Newtonian speeds.
| |
| | | | |
| − | July 15 - July 30<br>
| |
| − | - Basic Thermal Calculations, extensive Refactor.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | August 1 - August 15<br>
| |
| − | -Non-Newtonian entrance speeds, basic fluid dynamics integration (falling through water or striking it)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h1>Time availability<br></h1>
| |
| − | -4 week Field session ( Should be able to work ~40 hour weeks )<br>
| |
| | -Rest of summer free. | | -Rest of summer free. |
| | | | |
| − | I am applying to GSOC with BRL-CAD because it pertains to several area's I'm interested in, namely physics and 3D graphics. More importantly however is that it is a needed open source alternative which will further both the education of future generations, and also a valueable asset to the Engineering world. | + | I am applying to work with BRL-CAD because it pertains to several area's I'm interested in, namely physics and 3D graphics. More importantly however is that it is a needed open source alternative which will further both the education of future generation, but also the Engineering world. |
| | | | |
| | I would like to work with BRL-CAD for GSOC because I feel I can bring my knowledge of physics and programming to aid the developement. | | I would like to work with BRL-CAD for GSOC because I feel I can bring my knowledge of physics and programming to aid the developement. |
| − |
| |
| − | <h1>Anything Else</h1>
| |
| − | I use nearly exclusivly open source software and would like to become a permenant member of the open source community.
| |
