The BRL-CAD Logo depicts two interlocked nodes. Modeling the new Logo in BRL-CAD in CSG (without NURBS, without polygons) requires some careful arrangement, but can provide an attractive three dimensional rendering that we can use for a number of purposes..
The output of this task will be a .g file of BRL-CAD logo and a rendered image. The two segments you model MUST be two or more regions, ideally hinged together (you can have center pins or not, you decide). This is your opportunity as an artist and 3D magician to come up with an interesting yet faithful interpretation.
References:
- http://brlcad.org/images/angelov_256.png
- http://brlcad.org/d/node/92
- Introduction to MGED at http://brlcad.org/wiki/Documentation
Note that there are other logo modeling tasks and yours must start from scratch and be completely original. If we get a hint that yours was based off of or used measurements from some other model, you will be barred.
You are encouraged to discuss and share progress with the developers for interactive feedback.
I would like to work on this task.
This task has been assigned to ajeet kumar yadav. You have 72 hours to complete this task, good luck!
The work on this task is ready to be reviewed.
Ajeet, this is looking good, but you haven't joined the two links together. The black and pink links need to be put into or made into a region (see the 'r' command) and then those two regions need to be joined together into a single group (see the 'g' command).
Looking at your model, they currently overlap each other, which won't work. The black and pink portions need to link with each other or otherwise not have any overlaps (run "rtcheck" command). Ask questions if you get confused as this is a difficult concept for most new modelers.
One of the mentors has sent this task back for more work. Talk to the mentor(s) assigned to this task to satisfy the requirements needed to complete this task, submit your work again and mark the task as complete once you re-submit your work.
The work on this task is ready to be reviewed.
You're method for just subtracting all of shape2.s from shape1.s is not ideal, but it is a technically realistic solution. Overall, this is a nice model that hopefully someone will be able to build upon.
Congratulations, this task has been completed successfully.